Main Site | Forum Index | FAQ | Search | Memberlist | Usergroups |  Register |  Profile | Log in to check your private messages | Log in

Cool... I'm part monkey. And so are you.
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Unreal Zark Alliance Forum Index -> The Lounge
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Author
uZa Ten*K
Post Ho


Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 1937
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:12 pm    Post subject: Cool... I'm part monkey. And so are you. Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXdQRvSdLAs

Finally... undeniable proof of Evolution that Creationists cannot refute.

Let me say that this is a proud day in Man's history. We can finally say we know where we come from.

It is also a sad day in Man's history, because 70% of the World's population will refuse to accept the factual data proving our lineage... and continue to kill each other in the name of a God that does not exist.

PLEASE LET ME CLARIFY!!! I am not poo-pooing the existence of "God" or a "Higher Power". But, the "God" that so many believe in, and in whose name hundreds of millions have been slaughtered, the God of the Bible [the Old Testament being written by slaves who did not even know there was a "rest of the World", and the New Testament being written by monks 600 years after the death of Christ (whom I believe existed) that were "fasting" (a tradition of eating no food save what is known as Abbot Ale that is 13 to 15% alcohol) and looking for a means to maintain and expand the power base they had created through fire and sword] has been shown NOT to be the creator of Man.

I do believe in a higher order of the Universe. I do believe there is a destiny for Mankind. I believe that this proof is a key to the shackles of our past. I just hope I am not killed by one of "God's" followers before I can see our species reach it's potential.

Woot... I'm part monkey!!!
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.
View user's profile Send private message

Author
{uZa}Capt.Spamada
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 8485
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i believe there is a god, and i Do believe in Evolution, you cant really shrug evolution off and call it a hoax.

But i like the way he clarified that in the video.

But fighting under the name of god is sad, and that is why i dislike Organized religion.
_________________
***Help the Journey to 50,000 Posts***



View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
{uZa}Dellis
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 1142
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Cool... I'm part monkey. And so are you. Reply with quote

Okay, here we go....

Quote:

Finally... undeniable proof of Evolution that Creationists cannot refute.


To make this claim you must study all of the evidence presented by both sides, which you have not. Your presuppositions will not allow you to believe otherwise though. If I were to refute this "genome mapping" you would refuse to concede and acknowledge such because your presupposition states "There is no supernatural, there is no metaphysical, therefore there is no God"

It is like one stating, "There is no God" yet for them to make that claim factual they would first have to be everywhere in the known universe at the same time to make sure there is no God yet in order for them to do that they would have to be Omnipresent and Omniscient, which are two of Gods attributes, in other words they would be God.

So it is best stated....."In my opinion, there is no God" Just as I claim, "It is my belief (my presupposition) there is a God"

What this tape does not explain is why only a small percentage share a sequence? It is evident that there are shared sequences between genes BUT what is not evident is complete gene duplication throughout the genome. Using the same sequence we also see we have a link with fruit flies. So it is far from being "undeniable proof".

Quote:
and continue to kill each other in the name of a God that does not exist.


This is a statement often spoken in complete ignorance. I don't know of any wars started in the name of "atheism" but plenty of blood shed has been committed and many people have died at the hands of atheists. Also many people have been killed "in the name of God" yet these are people doing this because they "think" or believe it to be right. Most wars were for land under the disguise of religion. The only wars God has commanded are those we have within Scripture.

Lastly, if there is no God, why then do we not kill anyone we wish to? To claim that we have evolved is to state that at one time cold blooded murder was OK. Yet when do morals evolve, better yet, how do morals evolve?


Quote:
the God of the Bible [the Old Testament being written by slaves who did not even know there was a "rest of the World", and the New Testament being written by monks 600 years after the death of Christ


Your above statement makes no sense, at least nothing in the way of proving a point. So because "slaves" wrote the Scriptures and they did not know of the "rest of the world" makes them unreliable, liars and unable to write the things of God? Here again your presuppositions are showing.

By what evidence do you state that monks wrote the Scriptures 600 years AFTER the fact ? The canon of Scripture was being read as early as 100 A.D. Did you know that a fragment from the Gospel of John has been dated to the early 2nd century? So where you get "600 years" and "monks" I have no idea.

Quote:
and looking for a means to maintain and expand the power base they had created through fire and sword] has been shown NOT to be the creator of Man.


What you have not thought deeply upon is WHY create this God? In other words why on earth would man create such a Holy and Wrathful God? A God which is Absolutely Perfect? Is it because man is so guilty and shameful of his actions that he needed a way to feel better about himself? Well that can't be it for God demands perfection and if it were true, how come you don't have any need for repentance?

Since you deny God is the Creator you then hold to an empirical worldview. Empirical senses (touch, smell, sight, hearing and taste) are used to observe and therefore gain knowledge. Tell me then, which of your empirical faculties told you the word "potential" ? The point of my question is to show that no knowledge can come from observation for without having knowledge PRIOR to observing you would have no idea you're observing anything. So the question becomes, where did knowledge come from if not by observation? None of your senses, no amount of observation can bring about knowledge.

[/quote]
_________________
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
uZa Ten*K
Post Ho


Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 1937
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dellis, thank you for your thoughtful contributions. My perspective comes from a sincere following of evidence for both sides. The problem with each side of the argument was the lack of empirical data. Now, such data exists.

the "God that does not exist" belief (of mine) is the "God" that men make for themselves. Such a God cannot exist for the very reason that Man cannot know the mind of God. Remember, I said I do believe in a higher power. I simply do not believe that a specific group of people from over 1500 years ago were able to know the mind of such a being. I was raised in the Church, and from a very young age had trouble reconciling the "Word" with the application.

I believe we must understand ourselves and where we came from, as well as where we can go from here. My 1st point, my good friend, is that the realization that we were not created a few thousand years ago by an Almighty being will not be heard by the majority of the World, again, despite the overwhelming empirical evidence to the contrary, and that heinous acts will continue to be perpetrated in "His" name.

And I don't have all the answers, and in fact have a lot more questions. Thanks again for contributing... Too many people are afraid to say what they think. We hide our beliefs and get angry when others don't acknowledge them. Please, rebut as you see fit... this is a deep subject, one we usually don't talk about here.... But we have a brotherhood here... one that allows us the intimacy to speak frankly... as well as a general level of intelligence that allows us to understand that differing points of view don't require us to kill each other. You have to thank God for that.
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.
View user's profile Send private message

Author
{uZa} Glockster
Physco Killa


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 629
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So you are saying that all the monkeys out there will become humans one day? Smile
_________________
{uZa} Glockster
Hell is truth known too late. Riley
View user's profile Send private message

Author
{uZa}Studdog +SC+
Post Ho


Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 1351
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well put Dellis!

I don't think the guy proves anything. He has a theory, but to say something is similiar is not proof of how it came into being. I could write for days about how evolution is a big joke. Let's pick time for instance and I'll state a few ideas;

The oceans are salty due to rain on land that carries minerals to the ocean. The salt in the oceans appears to be from less than 20,000 years. Why are the oceans not like the Dead Sea if they are millions of years old.

Gravity is getting weaker. If the world is 10,000 years old that's not a problem. If it's millions, the dinosaurs would have not been able to move or live, due to high gravity.

The earth spins and is slowing down. If it's millions of years old, then nothing would have survived the winds alone due to the high speed spinning of the past.

The sun is shrinking at 5 feet per hour in diameter, again not a problem for a young earth. Millions of years, that would be a big problem!

Look at the spirals on the galaxies. Why are they there? The center is spinning faster than the outer. Take a cup of coffee and add cream. Stir the center slowly and you will see spirals. They won't last very long though; it will eventually get mixed up. Maybe the galaxies aren't 4.3 billion years old. Hmmm!

The list goes on and on. Evolution is a fairy tail believed by those who fear a God. An evolutionist may say he is afraid of creationists, but really it's God they fear. Watch how some evolutionists will say they are religious, but will get extremely mad at the thought of a supreme creator. Then who do they serve?

We are making huge leaps in knowledge in recent years. Unfortunately, creationism is not being taught. This leads to a lot higher amount of people being taught only one side. Is that a real education or indoctrination? Gee wonder why most scientist have a preconcieved idea of millions of years? You want an education, learn both sides. I recently visited the new creation museum and they state evolution and creationism views on every display. The truth really stands out when side by side. I have studied both and I have found it takes faith to believe in creation or evolution. I put my faith in the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Why are evolutionists so afraid of both sides being taught? I would say because it puts the fear of God in them, and that makes them very uncomfortable.

You should never base your life and soul on what other people think or say. If you want to know if God is for real then seek him, he will not hide from you. I picked up a King James version of the Bible and read, prayed, and God never hid from me. I found I was loved by a living God who was willing to die for me. There is no greater love than that! You will find there are lots of religious views. Ask God to show you the truth and lead you in the correct way.

It is cool you were willing to post on such a sensitive topic. I really enjoy studying creationism. To further elaborate, I am a Baptist, KJV Bible Believing Creationist, Christian. I believe the world is about 10,000 years old just like the bible claims. I am not offended by your post, and I hope I did not offend anyone with mine. Just wanted to share my humble opinion. Cool Cool Cool
_________________
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Author
{uZa}Capt.Spamada
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 8485
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many YEC's are out there?
And that Museum in the u.s is just silly was watching the news on it and seemed silly saying a Tyrannosaurus rex was a plant eater.

Arguing about Creationism and Evolution(not saying anyone here is), is a get no where debate, both sides have high egos and both will after reading or hearing what one says they wont change there mind, i have seen it on other forums.
After all the evidence one sides shows, the other side will just say it is a theory or that is has no point what so ever.

But i do have a few questions that no one ever seems to answer and maybe some one here might,

-If god made us in his Image, well then why does a Native American Looks different physically to lets say some one from China.

-And why are so many Transitional Fossils being found?

-No Creationist has ever explained, the Soil layers to me.

-Any Creationist want to show me there views on Fossil records?

-And why are things still Evolving to this date, if Evolution is just a theory?

I am looking forward to hear any answers Very Happy

Oh and im just a kid wanting to learn everyones views on it lol, so dont get offended if i said anything or come off as a bit strong.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
uZa Ten*K
Post Ho


Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 1937
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good response. So much of the internet is lost to the flotsam and jetsam, and honest arguments are too often lost in the sea of retardedness. That Paris Hilton going to jail got far more internet press than this is surely a symptom of the squandered power of the greatest communicating tool ever invented.

most of your points can be proven wrong with actual math and physics, but I'm not saying YOU are wrong. Again, I believe in a higher power, but I do not believe we are able to understand it at this point in our existence, much less thousands of years ago. I also don;t believe that "science" has all the answers. But I do believe that everything is eventual, and the day will come when the gap between what "is" and what "isn't" narrows, and eventually flip-flops.

We know that dinosaurs did exist... we know that they moved around... Salts group together and are deposited back on land where they are carried around the Earth by wind...

After 3.5 billion years the planet's rotation had slowed to 20.11 hours per day/night cycle and at a 100,000,000 years ago its rotation period had slowed to 23.6 hours, not that much different than the present rate. 100 MILLION YEARS! The earliest fossil (indisputable hard evidence of existence) records of Man's youngest possible ancestor are only 6 million years old. Thats a difference of 23.9 hours per day vs 24.0 hours per day. The Bible teaches that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old. Again, the Bible was written by men who had no idea of the World around them, and the Bible has been subject to revisionist history since it's inception. Come on... the Vatican (chief share holders inf "the Bible") didn't admit until 1992 that Galileo was right about the Earth moving around the Sun... to quote Pope Urban the 8th "The proposition that the sun is in the center of the world and immovable from its place is absurd, philosophically false, and formally heretical; because it is expressly contrary to Holy Scriptures"

Sun Shrinking? http://www.tim-thompson.com/resp8.html

"Evolution is a fairy tail believed by those who fear a God. An evolutionist may say he is afraid of creationists, but really it's God they fear. Watch how some evolutionists will say they are religious, but will get extremely mad at the thought of a supreme creator. Then who do they serve?"

I don't take your points personally (except that you said "fairy tail", when "fairy tale" is the appropriate term Razz ), and I hope you don't take mine that way, either, but... How is Evolution the "Fairy Tale?" there is no magic involved, there is no divine intervention, there is only what is reproducible in hard evidence. If one doesn't believe that evolution is possible, one must not believe in dogs.
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.
View user's profile Send private message

Author
{uZa}Dellis
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 1142
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

uZa 10K wrote:
Dellis, thank you for your thoughtful contributions. My perspective comes from a sincere following of evidence for both sides. The problem with each side of the argument was the lack of empirical data. Now, such data exists.

the "God that does not exist" belief (of mine) is the "God" that men make for themselves. Such a God cannot exist for the very reason that Man cannot know the mind of God. Remember, I said I do believe in a higher power. I simply do not believe that a specific group of people from over 1500 years ago were able to know the mind of such a being. I was raised in the Church, and from a very young age had trouble reconciling the "Word" with the application.

I believe we must understand ourselves and where we came from, as well as where we can go from here. My 1st point, my good friend, is that the realization that we were not created a few thousand years ago by an Almighty being will not be heard by the majority of the World, again, despite the overwhelming empirical evidence to the contrary, and that heinous acts will continue to be perpetrated in "His" name.

And I don't have all the answers, and in fact have a lot more questions. Thanks again for contributing... Too many people are afraid to say what they think. We hide our beliefs and get angry when others don't acknowledge them. Please, rebut as you see fit... this is a deep subject, one we usually don't talk about here.... But we have a brotherhood here... one that allows us the intimacy to speak frankly... as well as a general level of intelligence that allows us to understand that differing points of view don't require us to kill each other. You have to thank God for that.


The kind thoughts and words, right back at ya Smile

I understand your point fully but again I state that the "evidence" given or put forth by the genome project is not 100%. There are many areas yet left unanswered and as they discover a link to say a chimp, they also see a link to a fruit fly and other species. This though is again where our presuppositions come into play. We all have presuppositions, in fact to deny one has any is to then confirm them for that then is their presupposition.....that they have no presuppositions.

If you ask an atheist, "What proof do you need for their to be a God?" And if what they need for evidence happens they will reject it and seek to find a natural explanation for it because their presupposition tells them "There is no God".

Take care
_________________
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
uZa Ten*K
Post Ho


Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 1937
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

and Canada, you are right to want to know. The path to enlightenment begins with the desire to know truth for truth's sake. Just watch out for cynicism and steer clear of dogmas from either side... learn all you can and make your own judgments.
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.
View user's profile Send private message

Author
Spamitarium
Post Ho


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 3368
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm in agreement with Dellis 100%. No point in re-stating what he said.
_________________
View user's profile Send private message

Author
{uZa}Dellis
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 1142
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Capt.Spamada wrote:
How many YEC's are out there?
And that Museum in the u.s is just silly was watching the news on it and seemed silly saying a Tyrannosaurus rex was a plant eater.

Arguing about Creationism and Evolution(not saying anyone here is), is a get no where debate, both sides have high egos and both will after reading or hearing what one says they wont change there mind, i have seen it on other forums.
After all the evidence one sides shows, the other side will just say it is a theory or that is has no point what so ever.

But i do have a few questions that no one ever seems to answer and maybe some one here might,

-If god made us in his Image, well then why does a Native American Looks different physically to lets say some one from China.

-And why are so many Transitional Fossils being found?

-No Creationist has ever explained, the Soil layers to me.

-Any Creationist want to show me there views on Fossil records?

-And why are things still Evolving to this date, if Evolution is just a theory?

I am looking forward to hear any answers Very Happy

Oh and im just a kid wanting to learn everyones views on it lol, so dont get offended if i said anything or come off as a bit strong.


First, why is it ridiculous for Trex to be a plant eater? Lions eat grass when there is no other food around and apes, who also have large teeth, eat plants also. A better question to ask is, "How did the Trex eat anything with those stubby limbs? Was it able to place food in its mouth?

More likely than not Trex was a scavenger which ate from a dead carcass and in times of food shortage ate plants.

You wrongly attribute the word "image" to mean "physical representation". If you had read Scripture you would grasp that God is "spirit" and has no physical body therefore we are not created in the "physical" likeness of God but rather a spiritual likeness. God is a rational being, He has thought, expression, a will, etc. Likewise we also have those attributes but on a much more subdued level. For instance we have thought but we are not all knowing in our thought. None of the animals have these attributes which is why God created man separate from the animals.

Name me one transitional fossil? I would turn that question around and state that we have found millions of fossils, so why no transitional fossils?

Soil layers? I have no idea what you're talking about hence I can't help in the explanation.

Fossils are never made by a dead animal just dying. So a road kill never becomes a fossil because it will degrade and become broken down by animals eating it and bacteria breaking it down. Now take an animal and bury it alive under great pressure instantly and you'll then have a fossil. A mudslide can fossilize trees, plants and animals if conditions are right. So the fossil record can show many things, for one it clearly shows how a giraffe came from a giraffe, a rat from a rat, etc but we have no fossil of a lizard coming from a fish.

We have two types of evolution, micro and macro.

Micro evolution is on a small scale, within the species. Dogs for example can be evidence of microevolution for while we have 300 variety of dogs we have one species...."dog" A dog never becomes anything other than a dog for that is its "being"...to be a dog, not a horse, not a cow but a dog.

Macroevolution is evolution on a larger scale, It claims a jump from one species to another. So a fish like creature becomes a amphibian like creature and then a lizard, bird, mammal and then man. Of course this is over a large period of time and there is also "punctuated equilibrium" which was fancied by Stephan Jay Gould. In it he theorized that time was not a factor in evolution but rather mutations. So a lizard laid her eggs but one of the eggs mutated and hatched a bird like reptilian creature. Which is why, according to Gould, we have no transitional forms.

I want you to though THINK DEEPLY upon this, don't just throw it out of your mind as nonsense. If evolution be true then at some point that fish creature which evolved into a reptilian creature had to at some point in its evolving process have neither fins or legs but stubs and if so how then did it move and evade being eaten? At some point also its lungs were changing from water breathing to air breathing which meant a relocation of vital organs, different lung tissue and a reworking of blood cells to carry oxygen so again the question comes up, how or what did it breath during that time? If only one creature was evolving how many had to die before evolution stopped for that species? Well, only ONE.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
{uZa}Capt.Spamada
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 8485
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

{uZa}Dellis wrote:
Capt.Spamada wrote:
How many YEC's are out there?
And that Museum in the u.s is just silly was watching the news on it and seemed silly saying a Tyrannosaurus rex was a plant eater.

Arguing about Creationism and Evolution(not saying anyone here is), is a get no where debate, both sides have high egos and both will after reading or hearing what one says they wont change there mind, i have seen it on other forums.
After all the evidence one sides shows, the other side will just say it is a theory or that is has no point what so ever.

But i do have a few questions that no one ever seems to answer and maybe some one here might,

-If god made us in his Image, well then why does a Native American Looks different physically to lets say some one from China.

-And why are so many Transitional Fossils being found?

-No Creationist has ever explained, the Soil layers to me.

-Any Creationist want to show me there views on Fossil records?

-And why are things still Evolving to this date, if Evolution is just a theory?

I am looking forward to hear any answers Very Happy

Oh and im just a kid wanting to learn everyones views on it lol, so dont get offended if i said anything or come off as a bit strong.


First, why is it ridiculous for Trex to be a plant eater? Lions eat grass when there is no other food around and apes, who also have large teeth, eat plants also. A better question to ask is, "How did the Trex eat anything with those stubby limbs? Was it able to place food in its mouth?

More likely than not Trex was a scavenger which ate from a dead carcass and in times of food shortage ate plants.

You wrongly attribute the word "image" to mean "physical representation". If you had read Scripture you would grasp that God is "spirit" and has no physical body therefore we are not created in the "physical" likeness of God but rather a spiritual likeness. God is a rational being, He has thought, expression, a will, etc. Likewise we also have those attributes but on a much more subdued level. For instance we have thought but we are not all knowing in our thought. None of the animals have these attributes which is why God created man separate from the animals.

Name me one transitional fossil? I would turn that question around and state that we have found millions of fossils, so why no transitional fossils?

Soil layers? I have no idea what you're talking about hence I can't help in the explanation.

Fossils are never made by a dead animal just dying. So a road kill never becomes a fossil because it will degrade and become broken down by animals eating it and bacteria breaking it down. Now take an animal and bury it alive under great pressure instantly and you'll then have a fossil. A mudslide can fossilize trees, plants and animals if conditions are right. So the fossil record can show many things, for one it clearly shows how a giraffe came from a giraffe, a rat from a rat, etc but we have no fossil of a lizard coming from a fish.

We have two types of evolution, micro and macro.

Micro evolution is on a small scale, within the species. Dogs for example can be evidence of microevolution for while we have 300 variety of dogs we have one species...."dog" A dog never becomes anything other than a dog for that is its "being"...to be a dog, not a horse, not a cow but a dog.

Macroevolution is evolution on a larger scale, It claims a jump from one species to another. So a fish like creature becomes a amphibian like creature and then a lizard, bird, mammal and then man. Of course this is over a large period of time and there is also "punctuated equilibrium" which was fancied by Stephan Jay Gould. In it he theorized that time was not a factor in evolution but rather mutations. So a lizard laid her eggs but one of the eggs mutated and hatched a bird like reptilian creature. Which is why, according to Gould, we have no transitional forms.

I want you to though THINK DEEPLY upon this, don't just throw it out of your mind as nonsense. If evolution be true then at some point that fish creature which evolved into a reptilian creature had to at some point in its evolving process have neither fins or legs but stubs and if so how then did it move and evade being eaten? At some point also its lungs were changing from water breathing to air breathing which meant a relocation of vital organs, different lung tissue and a reworking of blood cells to carry oxygen so again the question comes up, how or what did it breath during that time? If only one creature was evolving how many had to die before evolution stopped for that species? Well, only ONE.


I like ur answers lol

you actually explained something to me, i usually ask a question to a creationist i get a bible thrown at me Razz

But when i meant Transitional fossils i meant one like this

http://www.physorg.com/news93110526.html

And I know about macro and micro evolution have a few books on it, I was just wondering what some ppls thoughts on things still evolving cause i have ran into alot of the hardcore creationists, who never give an answer and just say god.

But thanks, feels good for some one to actually answer me Smile
_________________
***Help the Journey to 50,000 Posts***



View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
{uZa}Capt.Spamada
Post Ho


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 8485
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh and the T-rex thing, the Museum was saying they were strictly plant eaters. So that is why i mentioned it
_________________
***Help the Journey to 50,000 Posts***



View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Author
uZa Ten*K
Post Ho


Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 1937
Back to top
Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm... apes are not meat eaters... mostly true. apes to have two sets of sharp fang-like teeth. Humans also have those same teeth, just not as pronounced.

the T-Rex, as an example, is but one variety of a species. T-Rexes, of course, were primarily meat eaters... the hundreds of millions of years it existed show that it got better (to a point) at eating meat... the design of its jaw, teeth, (the uselessness of it's arms when 25% of it's body was MOUTH) etc. But one can not believe in the T-Rex by virtue of the belief in Biblical Creationism. Again, the Bible states the World is just about 10,000 years old. this is, of course, contrary to all evidence.

Can the Creationist Theory show ANY evidence that the world is only 10,000 years old, or that Man just sprang out of the dirt (as far as I've seen, there is no DNA similarity between humans and dirt), or that evolution does not (at any level) occur?

The question of Micro vs Macro evolution is not really a question at all, as the Macrotic changes in species result from Microtic changes at the DNA level. And you cant get smaller than the acid groups that form DNA unless you go all the way to their elemental states.

We can manipulate the genes in DNA with current technology. This is an example of evolution. Some manipulations yield results that are favorable, some don't. I think the biggest barrier to people who cannot even begin to accept Evolution is Time, itself. It is the inability to conceive of millions, even billions of years, when our own time on Earth is limited to 70 to 90 years.

Imagine if Human kind had been the dominant species on this planet for the last 1,000,000,000 years. Would we look like what we do now? Would we, as a species, not change AT ALL in one billion years? I, for one, think that would be tremendously sad.
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.
View user's profile Send private message

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Unreal Zark Alliance Forum Index -> The Lounge All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


FSDark by SkaidonDesigns
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group