CMOS, Boo RADLEY, et ALL.

uZa Ten*K · Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: CMOS, Boo RADLEY, et ALL.

I do not apologize for the amount of space in this letter I intend to devote to telling you about uZa. With this letter, I hope to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by uZa. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: If you don't think that uZa's viewpoints are mired in petulant militarism, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. UZa contends that the sun rises just for it and that, therefore, a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces myopic lounge lizards (as distinct from the misguided hypochondriacs who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all entirely justified. In reality, contrariwise, uZa has been offering yellow-bellied caitiffs a lot of money to condemn innocent people to death. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that uZa's expositors will have to stop shouting "Me, me!" and learn to harmonize on "Us, us!". If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that anyone who disagrees with uZa is ultimately unreasonable, then there is indubitably no hope for you.

Maladroit big-labor bosses who throw us into a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation might not recognize the incongruities in uZa's activities, but uZa's policies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that uZa's memoranda are intended to put the foxes in charge of guarding the henhouse." While I know very little about primitive, crass kleptomaniacs, I do know that uZa labels anyone it doesn't like as "disreputable". That might well be a better description of it. This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to twist our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. Not yet, at least. But uZa will legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses deranged individuals with footling and uncontrollable rage. UZa frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter.

If some people are offended by my mentioning that I am proud that I'm not among the number of hopeless buggers of this world, then so be it. By excluding any possibility of comparison, uZa can easily pass off its own zingers as works of genius. In reaching that conclusion, I have made the usual assumption that I cannot compromise with it; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it, and with a warning it must unmistakably take to heart: My cause is to change the world for the better. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that if uZa can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen. I don't need to tell you that uZa's pals are ineducable. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that uZa's bootlickers are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is uZa, who wants nothing less than to cause an increase in disease, cynicism, crime, and vice. What I'm saying is this: the really interesting thing about all this is not that many new recruits of uZa's movement have come across a bridge of materialism. The interesting thing is that it wants nothing less than to set the hoops through which we all must jump, hence its repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of its mumpish cajoleries. While there is no evidence that uZa assigns blame to everyone but itself, it is clear that anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that uZa wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If uZa really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that it really struck a nerve with me when it said that it does the things it does "for the children". That lie is a painful reminder that uZa's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of uZa's cringers, who loudly proclaim that uZa has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of chauvinism. Regardless of those savage proclamations, the truth is that if you've read any of the benighted slop that it has concocted, you'll decidedly recall its description of its plan to defile the present and destroy the future. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that uZa operates on an international scale to trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to refute uZa's arguments line by line and claim by claim. In closing, uZa is a drooling, hydra-headed monster of force and terror.

I feel I must assert my freedom to comment on an important public issue that Miscreant Home Flipping (run by a Princess Boo Radley) has thrust into the vortex of public comment. It is worth noting at the outset that Miscreant Home Flipping can get away with lies (e.g., that it is a paragon of morality and wisdom) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Miscreant Home Flipping is lying. Miscreant Home Flipping has never tried to stop nutty wastrels who convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Miscreant Home Flipping encourages that sort of behavior. That reminds me: Miscreant Home Flipping once tried convincing me that embracing a system of fogyism will make everything right with the world. Does it think I was born yesterday? I mean, it seems pretty obvious that Miscreant Home Flipping may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider it to be a weapon of mass destruction itself. The question, therefore, must not be, "How uncompanionable can Miscreant Home Flipping be?", but rather, "How can something that claims to be so educated and so open-minded dare to create widespread psychological suffering?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because I, not being one of the many lazy, phlegmatic flimflammers of this world, aver that the best way to overcome misunderstanding, prejudice, and hate is by means of reason, common sense, clear thinking, and goodwill. Miscreant Home Flipping, in contrast, believes that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed. The conclusion to draw from this conflict of views should be obvious: Many people are incredulous when I tell them that Miscreant Home Flipping intends to destroy everything beautiful and good. "How could Miscreant Home Flipping be so shiftless?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is decidedly possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Miscreant Home Flipping plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that it will hinder economic growth and job creation. And to overcome these fears, we must find the common ground that enables others to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented.

The funny thing is, Miscreant Home Flipping claims to be fighting for equality. What it's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Miscreant Home Flipping used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that if I said that Miscreant Home Flipping is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being absolutely honest if I said that it can't possibly believe that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". It's avaricious, but it's not that avaricious. In many ways, Miscreant Home Flipping has declared that it's staging a revolt against everyone who wants to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. Miscreant Home Flipping's revolting all right; the very sight of it turns my stomach. All kidding aside, I'm not a cantankerous person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Miscreant Home Flipping's expositors and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to fight for what is right. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather put a militant, inhumane spin on important issues because that's what Miscreant Home Flipping wants. So don't tell me that by the end of the decade, Miscreant Home Flipping will order its spin doctors to rob from the rich but -- unlike Robin Hood -- give to treasonous lumpenproletariats just because it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. I don't believe that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position.

I've heard Miscreant Home Flipping say that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. Was that just a slip of the lip or is Miscreant Home Flipping secretly trying to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues? I would venture the answer has something to do with antiheroism. To elaborate, there is a problem here. A large, cocky, clueless problem. The brutish, psychotic nihilism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of grotesque brigands, nor of the aberrent nincompoops who take credit for others' accomplishments. It is the fault of Miscreant Home Flipping. One indication of this is the fact that if Miscreant Home Flipping succeeds in its attempt to torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses its path, it'll have to be over my dead body. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call it by name. Those names are Miscreant Home Flipping... and BOO RADLEY.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject:

_________________

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:09 pm Post subject:

That was rather vague, can you please elaborate? Shocked

_________________

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject:

I dont understand ethier Crying or Very sad

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject:

Boo will know what this is about, and MOS should remember too...
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:07 am Post subject:

clueless

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:49 am Post subject:

Is that one of Pimp's buddies? Very Happy

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:33 am Post subject:

He got on one of those website that create "blah" letters. Those are fun to send to your boss. That will really make them talk to you.
_________________
{uZa} Glockster
Hell is truth known too late. Riley

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:02 am Post subject:

Because of Mr. 10K Firestorm's attitude, I usually don't respond to his insinuations, but this time I'll make an exception. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. In the course of my work, I regularly come in contact with the most high-handed egotists I've ever seen, and most of them also feel that 10K says that divine ichor flows through his veins. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that his sermons have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply slovenly. Now, not only are they both simple-minded and dirty, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about 10K's sinful behavior, but about the way that 10K will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "predatory" or "postmodernist". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.

Somebody has to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within 10K's pea-sized brain. That somebody can be you. In any case, one does not have to perpetuate the myth that it is logorrheic to question 10K's actions in order to establish democracy and equality. It is a flippant person who believes otherwise. My cause is to condemn 10K's hypocrisy. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that 10K uses his victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that his musings prevent smallpox. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. The primary point of disagreement between myself and 10K is whether or not his most recent tractates are irreverent, in bad taste, and inappropriate. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated, then there is indeed no hope for you. Even if his facts were reliable, they were gathered selectively and then manipulated towards favored conclusions.

How can 10K live with himself, knowing that for his own sake, he should not promote mawkish ideologies such as absolutism? We must sincerely ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before 10K gets the opportunity to galvanize a disorderly hysteria, a large-scale version of the obtuse mentality that can force people to act in ways far removed from the natural patterns of human behavior. If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. It is clear from what I have already written that his publicity stunts are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us in the near future. To parody the old song, "Fish gotta swim, 10K gotta squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies." His criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, 10K's criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in his "I think … I believe … I feel" game.

10K is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own immoral ends. Why does he do that? To ask that question another way, when he looks in the mirror in the morning, does 10K see more than the same, illiberal face that all prurient yutzes share? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that 10K's lieutenants believe that we should derive moral guidance from 10K's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented bait-and-switch tactics. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that insufferable rakes of one sort or another are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive can believe anything, especially if it's false. Vapid bozos are more susceptible to his brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle 10K puts them in. They then lose all recollection that 10K's rejoinders should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that 10K's overgeneralizations are intended to deplete the ozone layer."

Take it from me: I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing 10K of planning to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that his grand plan is to take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, 10K might insult my intelligence eventually. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? On the other hand, once you understand 10K's zingers, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting 10K interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see 10K create a regime of unrealistic Lysenkoism. It makes me want to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that 10K's positions will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that.

Whatever 10K claims to the contrary, I feel no more personal hatred for him than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. His perspective is that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity. My perspective, in contrast, is that 10K's desire to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering is the chief sign that he's an obtrusive, psychotic braggadocio. (The second sign is that 10K feels obliged to promote the wicked hypnopompic insights of cruel, lackadaisical bribe-seekers.) But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that his jeremiads always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Maybe 10K just can't handle harsh reality. Contrary to what he would have you believe, even if his politics were utterly successful in making a few people feel better, they would still be demeaning to everyone else. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to.

10K's co-conspirators believe that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to point out the glaring contradiction between 10K's idealized view of insurrectionism and reality. In my view, I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point.

On that note, let me say that if we don't explain a few facets of this confusing world around us, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that if 10K had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages "before technocracy" he wouldn't be so keen to utilize questionable and illegal fund-raising techniques. Maybe he'd even begin to realize that he has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with quixotic freeloaders. Is this because he needs their help to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence? Well, I asked the question, so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that he maintains that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that if he would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by him and his apple-polishers. 10K has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, 10K's vows of equality did little more than convince people that 10K's idiotic claim that he can walk on water is just that, an idiotic claim. His sentiments are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: 10K's agendas have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung.

It may sound strange to 10K when I say that his responses to my attempts to debunk the nonsense spouted by his deputies generally involve crying, whining, and wrapping himeself in a self-protecting mantle of superiority, but if 10K thinks his paroxysms represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. It is not news that it's shocking just how materialistic he can be. What speaks volumes, though, is that 10K's vaporings are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, 10K somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that the Universe belongs to him by right. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization.

Inequality does not beget equality. Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: 10K's premise (that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet) is his morality disguised as pretended neutrality. 10K uses this disguised morality to support his antics, thereby making his argument self-refuting. It is quite true, of course, that writing instructors seeking to introduce the concept of "gangsterism" into their curricula could hardly do better than to use his ideas as an example. But there is no doubt that he will perpetrate acts of the most nugatory character by next weekend. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that anyone the least bit knowledgeable about 10K's disgusting background would know that 10K's whitewash of the issue offers no real analysis of the situation that resulted in his twisted nostrums in the first place. But did you know that gruesome, unimaginative carousers will always band together to terrorize our youngsters? He doesn't want you to know that because according to him, his shell games are Right with a capital R. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then 10K would realize that he's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, 10K tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday. Once one begins thinking about free speech, about cranky warmongers who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own insensate beliefs, one realizes that I plan to teach peevish traitors about tolerance. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that I myself can't possibly believe 10K's claim that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because 10K's most progressive idea is to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way. We can divide 10K's tricks into three categories: politically incorrect, detestable, and patronizing. In point of fact, if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to strengthen our roots so we can weather the storms that threaten our foundation. In the end, Mr. 10K Firestorm is a loose cannon.

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:12 am Post subject:

I have a few points of contention with Gomer. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: If Gomer truly believes that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. If he truly wanted to be helpful, Gomer wouldn't trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. Judgmental, intransigent purveyors of malice and hatred serve as the priests in his cult of anal-retentive anti-intellectualism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Gomer's reflected glory, pausing only when Gomer instructs them to create a factitious demand for his longiloquent, vengeful warnings. What could be more witless? The answer is rather depressing but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that Gomer's spokesmen are unified under a common goal. That goal is to cultivate an unhealthy sense of victimhood.

Of perhaps even more concern is that Gomer's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of escapism and you'll see a prissy lounge lizard hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of materialism in a debauched attempt to till the abysmal side of the jingoism garden. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Gomer does not merely take us over the edge of the abyss of irrationalism. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Take, as an example, the way that he wants to tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions. Well, he is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside himself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of his wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. Gomer's helots portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression, but are loath to reveal that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Gomer's gofers don't really care that I can say one thing about him. He understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount -- not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, Gomer's spin doctors have always found a way to elevate covinous carpers to the sublime. I want to reverse the devolutionary course Gomer has set for us. But first, let me pose an abstract question. How long shall there continue blathering doofuses to vend and unstable, crass bloodsuckers to gulp so low a piece of racialism as Gomer's undertakings? There is widespread agreement in asking that question, but there is great disagreement in answering it.

I believe it was Hegel who said, "Repressive antiheroism is his preferred quick-fix solution to complex cultural problems". Something recently occurred to me that might occur to Gomer, as well, if he would just turn down the volume of his voice for a moment: Gomer's fantasy is to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of careerism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that Gomer has a strategy. His strategy is to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with Gomer. That's just one side of the coin. The other side is that he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Gomer's willingness to demonstrate an outright hostility to law enforcement sets a new world record for brazenness. I have not forgotten that Gomer's violations of the rules of decency are so blinkered they beggar belief. I have not forgotten that since their emergence on the stage of history, the worst classes of money-grubbing flimflammers I've ever seen have been a parasitic growth on the stem of true citizens. And I cannot forget that Gomer claims to be supportive of my plan to change the world for the better. Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, he'll oppress, segregate, and punish others. Not only that, but Gomer's mutinous dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Commercialism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these slovenly, lewd trends is to put an end to bloody-minded defeatism. To be precise, if I didn't think he would put the foxes in charge of guarding the henhouse, I wouldn't say that he may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is thoroughly treacherous with everything else.

Please let me explain that Gomer's devotees feel that Gomer is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that I must ask that Gomer's hatchet men denounce those who claim that hanging out with inhumane undesirables is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to give lunatics control of the asylum. I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that Gomer has been offering dim-witted hedonists a lot of money to muzzle his critics. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that if I said that scummy bullies are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that if he were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that it will not be easy to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that I feel no more personal hatred for Gomer than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.

Gomer wants to break down traditional values. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Gomer's gossamer grasp of reality. I would like to put forth the possibility that he thinks it's good that his ideas let brown-nosing lumpenproletariats serve as our overlords. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: He is a human leech dedicated to sucking the life out of our doomed corpses. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that it seems that no one else is telling you that Gomer is indisputably exasperated by the limitations that have thus far denied him the ability to engulf the world in a dense miasma of wowserism. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, people tell me that Gomer would rather talk about making changes than actually make them. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. Some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with ridiculous, wicked cockalorums on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to destroy our moral fiber. So you see, Gomer's dream is to rule the world, or failing that, annihilate it.

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 10:45 am Post subject:

Holy hell I aint readin all that!
_________________

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 11:34 am Post subject:

Wow! This is as bad as chasing my tail........Well almost! Shocked

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:05 pm Post subject:

my eyes are tired now from reading all that.
_________________
***Help the Journey to 50,000 Posts***

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:22 pm Post subject:

Boo, you posted a random complaint letter waaaay back... i think on the old site. i stumbled across this one and remembered the confusion it caused when you posted it.

i threw CMOS in there cause he's kinda like the man in charge of the uZa company.
_________________

Humanism- Less Filling, Tastes Great.

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:23 pm Post subject:

I'll say it all in this:

Screw everyone else, but us!
_________________

Every man has to know his limitations, so Go Ahead, Make My DAY!