|
|
| Message |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| Message |
 Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
i am not a big Star Trek person, but it looks really good to me
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:20 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Looks great I love star trek.
_________________
Some days you get the bear and some days the bear gets you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:07 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Gona be a good one can't wait! 
_________________
+SC+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:01 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Thanks for posting that Eagle - I like the original Star Trek with James T. Kirk and the rest of the gang. I'm looking forward to seeing this one. 
_________________
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:25 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I must be the only one alive who thinks this movie looks like a B-rated flashback mixed with a little new age movies produced by hacks...
Just the hair alone makes me laugh so hard my eyes tear.
I just don't think star trek, and today's sex scene ridden movies mix too well.
_________________
http://docer.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:59 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Morgoth wrote: | I must be the only one alive who thinks this movie looks like a B-rated flashback mixed with a little new age movies produced by hacks...
Just the hair alone makes me laugh so hard my eyes tear.
I just don't think star trek, and today's sex scene ridden movies mix too well. |
You may be right. It will all come down to the acting. If they can "suspend disbelief" and make us forget Shatner and Nimoy and get to like the characters it could work really well (Christian Bale / Heath Ledger in Dark Knight) or it could be really stupid. (see ANY James Bond except Sean Connery)
It's always risky to mess with something that was really loved in its earlier incarnation especially where the actors who played the character really owned it. Star Trek was all about the interactions with Kirk and Spock and Bones - supported by Scotty and Zulu and Chekov and Uhrua. As cheesy as the show was, these characters just worked together. We will see if other actors can pull it off.
I don't mind the new effects and modernization. I suspect I will get used to that quickly. You couldn't even attempt to do something in the Star Trek "canon" today with the Styrofoam boulders effects of 1967. It would be laughed off the screen.
I think it is about 80% likely to be horrible, and 20% possible to be really good.
_________________
________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:24 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Good points Eagle.... but...
THE HAIR!! LOLZ 
_________________
http://docer.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:06 am Post subject:
|
|
|
BUT doesn't JJ Abrams bring something different to a stale series??? Don't get me wrong I love the Star Treks, especially the Scott Bakula one!
Bond=Connery!
_________________
+SC+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Message |
| Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| {uZa}Bullet Sponge wrote: | | i am not a big Star Trek person, but it looks really good to me |
Same here, I think it looks interesting.
Syler!!!!
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
